maddyhelps

Social Studies 9 · Market and mixed economies

Scarcity, and who decides

Every economy runs short of something. What differs is who decides what to do about it: buyers and sellers in a market, the government, or — in Canada and the United States — a mix of both.

The words, first

The idea: Scarcity is the problem. Market, command and mixed are three ways of answering it.

WordWhat it means
ScarcityWants are unlimited, but the resources to meet them — land, workers, money, time — are not.
Opportunity costThe next-best thing you give up when you make a choice.
The basic economic questionsWhat to produce, how to produce it, and for whom.
Market economyBuyers and sellers answer those questions, through prices, competition and private ownership.
Supply and demandSupply is how much sellers offer at each price. Demand is how much buyers want, and can pay for, at each price.
Surplus and shortageA surplus is more offered than wanted; a shortage is more wanted than offered.
Command economyThe government answers the basic questions. Also called a planned economy.
Mixed economyMarkets, plus a government that regulates, taxes, runs public programs and owns some businesses.
Government interventionAny government action that changes what a market would do on its own.
Crown corporationA business owned by a government, such as Canada Post or Alberta's ATB Financial.
PrivatizationSelling a government-owned business or service to private owners.
Labour unionWorkers who bargain with an employer as a group — collective bargaining — over pay and conditions.

Scarcity and the three questions

The idea: There is never enough of everything, so every choice gives something up. A country has the same problem as a school council, only bigger.

Start small. An invented school council has $5000 and three requests:

Water-bottle filling station $4000 · Bike racks $3000 · Sports equipment $1000

It cannot have all three. Choose the bike racks and the equipment ($4000 together), and the filling station is the opportunity cost. Choose the filling station and the equipment, and the bike racks are. Scarcity does not mean the council is poor. It means its wants are bigger than its budget, which is true of every family and every country.

Scale it up. A country asks what to produce (more houses or more pipelines?), how (many workers or machines, cheaply or cleanly?) and for whom (whoever can pay, whoever needs it most, or everyone equally?). A market economy lets prices answer; a command economy has the government answer. Every real economy mixes the two, and the argument is always about how much of each.

How a market answers

The idea: In a market nobody sets the price. It moves until the amount people want to buy matches the amount sellers bring.

pricebasketsDemandSupplyprice settles here$540$8surplus$3shortage
At $8, sellers bring 64 baskets but buyers want only 16: a surplus, so prices fall. At $3, buyers want 56 but sellers bring only 24: a shortage, so prices rise. The price settles at $5, where 40 are wanted and 40 offered.

Worked through. Strawberry growers at an invented farmers' market start at $8 a basket. Few people buy, and by noon they cut prices rather than let fruit spoil. Another week a grower starts at $3 and sells out in minutes, so next time she charges more. Within a few weeks the price settles near $5. Nobody ordered it — the idea usually summed up in the economist Adam Smith's phrase from 1776, the “invisible hand”. Underneath are the market's principles: private property, the profit motive, competition (a buyer can walk to the next table), and consumer sovereignty (what buyers choose decides what gets grown next year).

Where markets struggle. A market answers for whom with “whoever can pay”. It will not build a road nobody can be charged for using, and a factory's prices leave out the smoke it puts in everyone's air. When what is scarce is hospital care rather than strawberries, many people will not accept that answer. That is where government comes in.

Canada's mixed economy

The idea: Canada and the United States both mix markets with government. They differ in how far, and on which things.

every real economy sits somewhere in here Planned the state decides what is produced Mixed markets, with public services and regulation Free market supply and demand decide Canada
No real country sits at either end. Canada and the United States are both mixed; on health care, the United States sits closer to the market end.

The tools. Regulation: the Alberta Energy Regulator sets rules for oil and gas companies. Public programs: every province pays for medically necessary doctor and hospital care. Ownership: Crown corporations such as Canada Post and ATB Financial. Governments move both ways: in 1993 Alberta sold its government liquor stores, and private stores now sell alcohol under provincial licences.

Canada and the United States. Each Canadian province runs public health insurance paid for through taxes. In the United States, most working-age people are insured privately, usually through an employer, and government programs cover mainly people 65 and older (Medicare) and some people with low incomes (Medicaid).

Labour unions bargain for all their members at once, and can strike if talks fail. Supporters say they raise wages and safety; critics say they raise costs and can shut down services. Some American states have “right-to-work” laws stopping unions from requiring every worker they represent to pay dues; Canadian provinces generally do not.

Reading a source on economic systems

The idea: Economic sources place their speaker somewhere on the line. Work out where, then predict what that speaker would say about a policy.

Source. Two invented speakers. Speaker I, a cattle rancher: “My calves are priced at auction, by buyers bidding against each other. That is fair. I don't need government telling me what they are worth.” Speaker II, a nurse: “Nobody should have to check their bank account before they see a doctor.”

Reading it. Speaker I trusts supply and demand; Speaker II wants health care handled by a public program. So Speaker I would most likely oppose a government-set price for cattle, and Speaker II would most likely support public health insurance.

The point most students miss. These two need not disagree at all. A mixed economy can leave cattle to the market and doctor visits to government. The tempting wrong answer is that Speaker II supports a command economy — but she wants one service provided publicly, which is intervention within a mixed economy, not the government running everything.

What costs marks

The idea: Four, mostly vocabulary.

  • Calling Canada socialist, or the United States a pure market economy. Both are mixed.
  • Confusing opportunity cost with price. It is what you gave up, not what you paid.
  • Swapping surplus and shortage. A shortage is more wanted than offered, and pushes prices up.
  • Treating a Crown corporation as a government department. It is a business that a government owns.

Practice this unit Build a quiz